Please e-mail suggestions for other stories we should link to, to firstname.lastname@example.org. At some point we may need someone with superior sorting abilities to categorise and organise the stories; if you could be that person, please contact us.
In this article from the online magazine Social Europe, two of the lawyers who fought the court case commented on in our previous post, describe the legal consequences of the ruling. The term “historic” may be well-deserved. Lawyers, sharpen your pencils!
A court case brought by a group of young environmental activists has succeeded in forcing the German government to step up its efforts to combat climate change. Judges in the country’s highest court ordered the government to strengthen legislation before the end of the year, to protect future generations — and the government has agreed. This comes two years after another major victory in the Netherlands. In the UK, success in the courts has been more limited. A case won initially by Plan B in February 2020 to prevent the constuction of a third runway at Heathrow, was overturned in January this year by the Supreme Court, for what seem like legal technicalities — see the report by Plan B and the detailed legal analysis by the international law firm White and Case.
Our online Climate Hustings took place on April 19th. Continue reading to access a recording...
Nearly 200 people registered on Eventbrite. For reasons unknown, the upgrade to our Zoom license to accommodate everyone did not take effect, and so only 100 were able to attend. We apologise to those who were unable to join the Zoom call for that reason. The event was recorded, however, and the chat was particularly lively! We hope to stage more online events in the near future, so watch this space, or write to email@example.com to be put on the mailing list to receive alerts for forthcoming events.
Representatives from the Greens, Liberal Democrats, Labour and the Conservatives will answer questions from the public, with Alan Heap, from Purple Monster, in the chair. To ask a question, please send it by the evening of Thursday April 8th, to firstname.lastname@example.org
The study estimates 10.2 million deaths in 2012 were due to fine particulates, dropping to 8.5 million in 2018. Of the 2012 total, 62% were in China (3.9 million) and India (2.5 million). The figures are more than twice as high as previously believed. See the Guardian report from Feb 9th and the published study, in the journal Environmental Research (behind a paywall, unfortunately, but available through university libraries).
Following up on yesterday’s post about the French “case of the century”, here is a link to a report from the United Nations Environment Programme, UNEP, released last month, on global climate litigation. By July 2020, the number of climate change cases had grown to more than 1,550, filed in 38 countries. Hopefully, this growing wave of climate cases will drive much-needed change. Unfortunately the law can also be used to defend the status quo. Thirteen US states have now brought in legislation to penalise protest against the fossil fuel industry. This article from Huffington Post, in June 2020, reports on Mississipi’s legislation, under which individuals and organisations which cause damage or losses that total more than $1,000 ― for example, by halting production at a refinery or stopping the flow of fuel through a pipeline ― could face felony charges punishable by up to seven years in prison and fines of up to $100,000.
Four French environmental organisations, Oxfam France, Notre Affaire à tous, Fondation pour la Nature et l’Homme and Greenpeace France, took the French state to court for its failure to fulfil its commitments under the Paris climate accord — and won! A Guardian article from Feb 3rd, 2021 reports on the case. The Tribune Administratif de Paris, giving the official report, calls it L’ Affaire du Siècle (The case of the century).
— one of the key messages of the review by renowned Cambridge economist Sir Partha Dasgupta into biodiversity. The 600-page review was commissioned by the UK Treasury, the first time a national finance ministry has authorised a full assessment of the economic importance of nature. A similar Treasury-sponsored review in 2006, the Stern Report, is credited with transforming economic understanding of the climate crisis.
The UK government website offers the full 600 page report, a 103 page abbreviated report, and a 10 page summary of headline messages. Take your pick!
From the announcement sent out on January 21st by the UK Government Cabinet Office and Alok SharmaMP, President of the COP26 Climate Talks:
Applications have opened today to help shape the COP26 venue in Glasgow ahead of the crucial climate change talks later this year.
Groups of all kinds have the opportunity to bring climate action to life through fun and lively events, displays and workshops in the areas where many of the world’s leaders will be meeting in November.
This is likely to include demonstrations of virtual reality technology; showcasing innovation helping to tackle global climate change; opportunities for local voices from around the world through culture and arts; and youth groups provided a platform to show the impact they are making.
Organisations are being encouraged to work together with collaborative proposals wherever possible, with a focus on profiling the voices of those most impacted and on the front line of climate change.
The Guardian reports (13-1-2021) on a recent paper by a group of distinguished scientists, freely available in the online academic journal Frontiers in Conservation Science, Underestimating the challenges of avoiding a ghastly future. It surveys a large body of published work and draws a sombre conclusion. Besides documenting the ongoing Sixth Extinction, it considers the world’s political response, and links the growing tide of ethnic nationalism and populism to the increasing strain on resources and economic structures. It describes the apparent paradox of the continued rise in global human living standards, in the midst of ecological decline, as a global Ponzi scheme which will inevitably end with an ecological crash.